Helping California Families With Their Estate Needs
Estate Planning
We create and update estate plans that protect our clients’ futures.
Estate Administration
We guide families through the administration of trusts and other assets.
welcome to dayton law firm
Build A Plan That
Works For You
Anyone with assets can benefit from an estate plan. We offer options for people from all walks of life. Estate planning can save your loved ones from making difficult decisions after you pass away or if you become unable to make your own decisions. It can also ensure that your wishes for both your assets and your care will be met.
At The Dayton Law Firm, P.C., our team of San Jose estate planning attorneys is compassionate to families and individuals. We aim to help answer questions about your long-term planning options. We help with a variety of estate needs, including:
- Wills and trusts
- Retirement planning
- Probate
- Asset protection
- Trust administration
Why Choose Us?
We focus on our clients. While some firms seek the highest-value cases with disregard for the clients’ needs, we focus solely on what techniques are going to help you most.
Competitive Pricing
We strive to keep our hourly and flat fees accessible to as many families as possible.
Experience
We use our knowledge from planning and administering estates to achieve efficient legal solutions with a process proven to work.
Personalized Legal Work
By blending industry standards with custom in-house templates, we can advise and customize your plan to include your wishes to make sure it works how you want.
Free Consultations
We offer initial consultations at no charge so we can evaluate your legal needs before you ever receive a bill. Please call us at 408-758-5750 or email us to schedule an appointment.
Our firm is located in San Jose and serves the entire Bay Area. We also serve clients throughout California.
latest articles
Our Recent Blogs
The role of a trustee is to manage and administer a trust within the boundaries and stipulations of the trust. When there are multiple trustees, they are known as co-trustees and they must work together to fulfill the obligations of the trust and in the best interests of the beneficiary while staying aligned with the terms of the trust.
While there can be numerous reasons for disputes among co-trustees, there are still legal standards that must be adhered to when administering the trust. When those legal standards are ignored or violated, dispute resolution must be initiated. If resolutions cannot be reached successfully, legal procedures for trustee removal must be followed to continue acting in the best interests of the beneficiaries. The Dayton Law Firm, P.C. estate planning and administration attorneys can help you navigate co-trustee disputes and their resolution.
Common Causes of Co-Trustee Conflicts
Trustee disputes can arise due to several different reasons, including opinions and interpretations regarding the trust document, arguments regarding asset distribution or investment decisions, claims of breaching fiduciary duties, interpersonal and family dynamics when trustees are related, breakdowns in communication, or more.
Navigating these disputes can be tricky, especially when personalities clash or personal connections to the trust or beneficiaries cloud judgment, making it helpful to have a neutral third-party like the trust administration attorneys of The Dayton Law Firm, P.C., help resolve disputes before they result in costly fees and troubles.
If disputes are allowed to escalate, they can cause a host of additional problems, including distribution delays which could put trustees in violation of the terms of the trust, financial harm to the beneficiaries which would violate the trustees’ legal requirement to act in the best interest of the beneficiaries, and increased legal costs as the disputes are argued and arbitrated in court.
Especially when disputes involve interpretations of the trust’s provisions, having an attorney review the documents and arbitrate between the co-trustees can resolve disagreements quickly, reducing headaches and delays.
Mediating disputes as soon as they occur rather than waiting as they fester and cause additional problems keeps the trustees aligned with their duties and avoids increased expenses.
Fiduciary Duties of Co-Trustees Under California Law
Per California law, trustees are “duty-bound to act with the utmost good faith for the benefit of the other party,” meaning they must be loyal to and act in the best interests of the beneficiaries of the trust.
When beneficiaries of a trust have competing interests, it is the legal duty of the co-trustees to deal completely impartially with them, taking the competing interests into account and determining the best course of action for the trust without relying on personal opinions of the beneficiaries. This can be made both simpler or more complicated by having co-trustees administrate the trust, as they can either come to a consensus regarding how to stay impartial, or it can create disputes if the co-trustees disagree on what the impartial decision should be.
This is a scenario where it is useful to have a trust administration attorney help mediate disputes to ensure the trustees’ actions remain impartial.
Trustees additionally must prudently and expediently manage trust assets. Upon assuming the role of trustees, they must immediately take control of trust assets and secure them to prevent delays, risk of unauthorized access to trust assets, or depreciation and devaluation of its holdings.
According to California Probate Code Sections 15620-15622, co-trustees must act in unison, unless the trust agreement provides alternative provisions. All decisions for trust actions must be made collaboratively and by unanimous agreement, barring any provisions stating otherwise in the trust. This limits liability and provides a check and balance system for the co-trustees, protecting them as they act in the interest of the beneficiaries.
Co-trustees must conduct themselves to avoid claims of conflict of interest by avoiding trustee positions on trusts that would have them in conflict with the best interests of the beneficiaries of the first trust. They also have a duty to work to make the trust’s property productive and to keep entrusted assets separate from any of their personal assets to avoid any real or perceived risks and conflicts.
Initial Steps When a Disagreement Arises
Co-trustees are likely to face at least some degree of disagreement or conflict when administering a trust, as differences of opinion are only human. Often, a trust that names co-trustees will contain provisions for determining a tiebreaker when there are disputes as to the best course of action, and the documents might also include guidance that will negate one side of the conflict.
All communications and decisions should be carefully documented for review and reference, including the rationale behind decisions and any discussions that led up to the decision, to reduce future confusion or disagreements.
When disputes happen, scheduling a formal meeting to clarify rather than relying on written communication, where subtext, tone, and nuance can be difficult to parse, can help resolve them quickly. In the event that a formal meeting does not resolve the dispute, arranging a mediation session with an estate or trust administration attorney can clarify issues and help move past them without further argument.
Transparency with beneficiaries on why decisions were made and the logic behind the trustees’ actions improves relationships between the parties. It can head off disagreements and disputes about how the trust is being administered. This is another reason why detailed documentation and a record of all communications are so important in avoiding disputes.
When disagreements or differences of opinion in how to administer trusts arise, quick communication is essential in solving problems before they escalate. One conversation can help trustees avoid extensive legal headaches and conflicts down the road.
Mediation and Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
Mediation between co-trustees, or trustees and beneficiaries, when a beneficiary believes the trustee(s) are not acting in their best interest, is the first step that should be taken in resolving conflict. Not only is it a confidential process, but it is also generally faster, more effective, and the least costly option in settling disputes.
When mediation is sought as an option for resolving disputes, it is hosted by a neutral third party to arbitrate and moderate a discussion between the parties involved in the dispute. Through the discussion, the goal is to find common ground and come to a consensus that is a fair compromise for the involved parties. Being a less adversarial process than litigation, mediation can preserve family and personal relationships and leave all involved in the dispute feeling good about the resolution.
Since mediation is not done through the court system, it is faster and less costly than litigation, as it does not involve the time and legal fees incurred by litigation. An experienced estate lawyer, such as the attorneys at The Dayton Law Firm, P.C., will facilitate dispute resolution while maintaining the integrity of the trust. They can also help develop creative, flexible solutions to the disagreement that are tailored to the agreement and the beneficiaries’ best interests.
Arbitration and mediation are forms of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) that are recognized as legal methods of dispute resolution by the California judicial system, and can be easily navigated with the help of a neutral third party such as a trust attorney or professional mediator.
Going to Court: Petitioning for Instructions or Intervention
Mediation between co-trustees, or trustees and beneficiaries, when a beneficiary believes the trustee(s) are not acting in their best interest, is the first step that should be taken in resolving conflict. Not only is it a confidential process, but it is also generally faster, more effective, and the least costly option in settling disputes.
When mediation is sought as an option for resolving disputes, it is hosted by a neutral third party to arbitrate and moderate a discussion between the parties involved in the dispute. Through the discussion, the goal is to find common ground and come to a consensus that is a fair compromise for the involved parties. Being a less adversarial process than litigation, mediation can preserve family and personal relationships and leave all involved in the dispute feeling good about the resolution.
Since mediation is not done through the court system, it is faster and less costly than litigation, as it does not involve the time and legal fees incurred by litigation. An experienced estate lawyer, such as the attorneys at The Dayton Law Firm, P.C., will facilitate dispute resolution while maintaining the integrity of the trust. They can also help develop creative, flexible solutions to the disagreement that are tailored to the agreement and the beneficiaries’ best interests.
Arbitration and mediation are forms of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) that are recognized as legal methods of dispute resolution by the California judicial system, and can be easily navigated with the help of a neutral third party such as a trust attorney or professional mediator.
When Removal Becomes Necessary
When a trustee is determined to be acting against the terms of the trust or the best interests of the beneficiaries, they can be asked to either resign or be removed as a trustee.
There are many paths to removing a co-trustee from administering a trust. They can be removed by petition from one of the co-trustees, a settlor, or a beneficiary. Alternatively, they can be removed by the court on its own volition or following provisions in the trust instrument.
Under California law, there are several grounds for removing a co-trustee. Included in reasons for the removal of a co-trustee are fiduciary duty breach, threatening the administration of the trust through hostility or a deadlock in making decisions for its assets, the incapacity or unfitness of the trustee to complete their duties, or the court using its discretion to remove the trustee to act in the best interest of the trust.
The petitioner who is attempting to remove the co-trustee must file a petition with the court, after which a hearing will be scheduled. During the hearing, the petitioner must provide good-faith evidence of why the co-trustee should be removed from their duties. The person petitioning the court must have a legitimate interest in the trust per California Probate Code § 15642(d); otherwise, they will bear the costs of the claim. Their evidence must show exactly why the removal of the co-trustee is necessary to protect the trust and the interests of the beneficiaries.
During the dispute, a neutral third party serving on behalf of the court may be appointed as a temporary trustee to act on behalf of the trust until the issue is resolved, as trials to remove a trustee can take over a year.
Consequences of Trustee Misconduct
The court is there to protect the best interests of the trust, and thus enforces strict penalties for trustee misconduct. If a co-trustee is found to have mismanaged assets, violated their fiduciary duties, or acted against the best interests of the entity, they can face personal, civil, or even criminal penalties.
Suppose a co-trustee is found to act in negligence or bad faith. In that case, they can face personal liability for any losses incurred by the trust and be forced to make the trust and beneficiaries whole financially.
The courts can also require the trustee to reimburse the petitioner for costs and attorney fees they incurred in working to remove the trustee from administering the trust.
In the case of fraud, theft, or embezzlement as the reason for the trustee’s removal, California courts can impose criminal penalties, including fines or even jail time on the trustee.
If you, as a trustee, are under scrutiny and need to work to defend yourself in probate court, having an experienced trust attorney at your side to guide you through the process and argue against the claims can protect you both legally and financially.
Protecting the Trust: Best Practices for Co-Trustees
To avoid conflicts while administering trusts, co-trustees should immediately establish roles and how they’ll make decisions and what to do in the event of a decision tie, documenting these procedures and keeping them with the documents for reference. Having clearly defined roles and procedures removes much of the ambiguity of being co-trustees and helps actions run smoothly.
While administering trusts, co-trustees should regularly discuss and review tasks to ensure duties are being split equitably and decisions are agreed upon.
All decisions and communications should be rigorously documented, and all communication should remain open and recorded to reduce misunderstandings and create a clear paper trail in the event of any disputes.
If a trust is complex, appointing a professional fiduciary to work in conjunction with co-trustees can ensure the trust’s terms are followed and financial decisions are made that truly work in the best interest of the beneficiaries. For trustees with average financial knowledge, a professional fiduciary can prevent many problems before they even start.
Careful planning and active prevention of problems through the advice of an attorney are essential to following the provisions of the trust and preserving personal and family relationships involved in its administration.
How The Dayton Law Firm, P.C. Can Help
The Dayton Law Firm, P.C. attorneys are experts at managing co-trustee disputes and mediating disagreements between family members involved in trusts. They can guide you in performing your duties as a co-trustee to ensure proactive mediation and resolution of conflicts before they escalate to trustee removal petitions or breach claims, and can advise trustees on how to properly administer trusts and act in the best interests of the beneficiaries.
If a trustee dispute goes to trial and a temporary, neutral trustee is needed, The Dayton Law Firm, P.C. can serve as a court-appointed trustee and maintain the trust and act for the beneficiaries while the legal proceedings occur.
Whether you are attempting to prevent or are currently involved in a co-trustee conflict, the experienced trust and arbitration attorneys at The Dayton Law Firm, P.C. can provide expert advice and guidance through the process.
Resolving Disputes for the Good of the Trust
Conflict resolution regarding co-trustee disputes must be swift and fair to reduce harm to the trust and beneficiaries. If the process is drawn out, the co-trustees can be financially, personally, or criminally liable for any losses. Although these disputes can be challenging and emotionally fraught, the legal guidance of the legal team at The Dayton Law Firm, P.C. can simplify the process and ease the way. Contact the team today for assistance with your trust administration and co-trustee conflict resolution needs.
When a loved one passes away, families often find comfort in knowing that a revocable living trust will guide the distribution of assets, sparing them from the costly and time-consuming probate process. But what happens when an asset like a home, a bank account, or a business interest was never properly transferred into the trust? Many people mistakenly believe that this oversight means formal probate is unavoidable. In California, however, there is a powerful legal remedy that can often correct this problem: the Heggstad petition.
At The Dayton Law Firm, P.C., we frequently assist clients in navigating this exact situation. Below, we take a deep dive into what a Heggstad petition is, when it’s appropriate, and how it can help you protect your loved one’s estate while avoiding probate court.
Understanding the Heggstad Petition
A Heggstad petition is a legal filing made under California Probate Code §850 that allows a trustee to request a court order confirming that an asset belongs to a trust—even if the title was never formally transferred. The process is named after the landmark case Estate of Heggstad (1993), in which a California appellate court ruled that a written schedule of trust property could be enough to bring an asset into a trust, even if the legal title was not updated.
This remedy is particularly valuable because it enables families to avoid the probate process for assets that were inadvertently left out of the trust but were clearly intended to be included.
When a Heggstad Petition Makes Sense
A Heggstad petition is appropriate when a trust exists, but one or more assets were not correctly titled in the trust’s name. The most common example is a home where the deed still lists the decedent individually rather than the trust. Other examples include investment accounts, bank accounts, or business interests that were omitted from the formal trust transfer process.
However, this is not a free pass. It works best when there is strong evidence that the settlor—the person who created the trust—intended for the asset to be part of the trust. This intent can often be shown through a schedule of assets attached to the trust, a general assignment document, or correspondence that makes the settlor’s wishes clear.
Legal Requirements for Success
Not every Heggstad petition is granted. The court evaluates several factors before approving such a request. First and foremost, the trust must be valid and clearly show the settlor’s intent to include the disputed asset. A Schedule A or similar document listing the asset—even in general terms—can be critical. A general assignment document stating that the settlor intended to transfer “all personal property and real estate” into the trust may also help.
Supporting evidence can include declarations from the trustee or attorney who prepared the trust, copies of financial statements, and any written communications from the settlor. The court also considers whether there is any opposition to the filing. If other beneficiaries or heirs contest the request, the case may become more complex and require additional legal briefing or a hearing.
Assets Commonly Addressed in Heggstad Petitions
Real estate is the most common asset involved in Heggstad petitions. A decedent might have listed the property in the trust’s schedule but never formally recorded a deed transferring title into the trust. In such cases, this process allows the trustee to avoid probate by securing a court order confirming the trust’s ownership of the property.
Other assets that can be included through these petitions include:
- Bank and brokerage accounts
- Business interests, such as shares in an LLC
- Valuable personal property, in some cases
It’s important to note that certain assets, like retirement accounts or jointly held property, may not qualify unless they were explicitly addressed in the trust documents and beneficiary designations.
The California Heggstad Petition Process
Filing a Heggstad petition is a court-based legal procedure, but it is generally more streamlined than a full probate process. The process begins with a thorough review of the documents and the asset in question. The trustee, often working with an attorney, then prepares a petition under Probate Code §850.
The documents are filed with the probate court in the county where the decedent resided or where the property is located. Interested parties, such as other beneficiaries or heirs, must be notified. If no one objects, the court may approve the petition without a formal hearing. However, many counties schedule a hearing by default.
If the petition is approved, the court issues an order confirming that the asset is part of the trust. This order is then recorded (in the case of real property) or presented to the financial institution or entity holding the asset, allowing the trustee to assume control.
Why Choose a Heggstad Petition Over Probate?
Compared to probate, a Heggstad petition is often faster, cheaper, and far less invasive. Probate proceedings can last a year or more and involve court supervision, mandatory notices, creditor claim windows, and higher attorney and executor fees. In contrast, Heggstad petitions may be resolved in a matter of weeks or a few months, depending on court schedules and whether there are any objections.
Another significant advantage is privacy. Probate is a public proceeding, meaning that anyone can review the inventory of the estate. A Heggstad petition, while still filed with the court, typically involves fewer disclosures and less risk of public exposure.
Most importantly, a successful petition allows the trustee to administer the trust as originally intended, honoring the decedent’s wishes without triggering an unnecessary court process.
Mistakes That Lead to the Need for a Heggstad Petition
Heggstad petitions are often necessary due to preventable mistakes made during the estate planning process. These include:
- Failing to record a new deed transferring real property into the trust
- Forgetting to change account titles or ownership after creating the trust
- Believing that simply listing the asset in Schedule A was sufficient
- Not updating the trust as new assets were acquired
These missteps highlight the importance of working with an experienced estate planning attorney. At The Dayton Law Firm, P.C., we conduct full funding reviews to ensure all assets are properly transferred and that the trust is ready to function without court intervention.
When Heggstad Petitions Aren’t Enough
While powerful, these petitions aren’t appropriate in every case. Courts may deny the petition if the trust lacks any documentation of the disputed asset or if there are credible objections from heirs or creditors. Likewise, if the asset was acquired after the settlor’s death and not formally included in the trust, the petition may not apply.
Ambiguity in the trust’s language, missing schedules, or evidence that contradicts the settlor’s intent can all prevent a successful outcome. In these situations, formal probate or litigation may be required.
How The Dayton Law Firm, P.C. Can Help
If you’ve discovered that a loved one’s asset was left out of their trust, don’t panic. The experienced attorneys at The Dayton Law Firm, P.C. can evaluate whether a Heggstad petition is an option in your case. We guide clients through the entire process, from gathering evidence and preparing the filings to appearing in court and securing the final order.
We also assist families in updating or correcting existing trusts and ensure that all assets are properly transferred. Whether you’re in the early stages of administering trusts or facing challenges with an omitted asset, we provide the clarity and legal support you need.
Frequently Asked Questions
The following are answers to some of the most frequently asked questions we at The Dayton Law Firm, P.C., receive regarding Heggstad petitions:
How long does a Heggstad petition take?
In most cases, the process can be completed within two to four months, depending on court availability and whether any objections are raised.
Can I file a Heggstad petition without a lawyer?
It’s possible, but strongly discouraged. These petitions require specific evidence, legal analysis, and procedural compliance that most individuals are not equipped to handle without the assistance of counsel.
What if someone objects to the petition?
If an interested party contests the petition, the case becomes adversarial and may involve a formal hearing, legal briefs, and witness declarations. Representation by a probate attorney is essential in contested cases.
Is a Heggstad petition the same as trust litigation?
No. A Heggstad petition is a procedural request to confirm trust ownership of an asset. Litigation, by contrast, involves disputes over the validity or interpretation of the trust itself.
Can a Heggstad petition be filed years after death?
Yes, but delays can make the process harder. It’s best to act promptly while records and witnesses are still available.
Avoid Probate with the Right Legal Strategy
When assets are left out of a trust, many families assume that probate is the only solution. But with the help of a Heggstad petition, you may be able to correct this mistake and administer the estate privately and efficiently. The Dayton Law Firm, P.C. has helped countless California families do just that.
If you’re facing questions about an improperly funded trust or a missing asset, contact us today for a consultation. We’ll review your situation and help determine whether a petition is the right path forward.
Gifting can be a generous and strategic way to reduce your taxable estate, support loved ones during your lifetime, and ensure a smooth transfer of wealth. But when it’s done incorrectly, gifting can create legal complications, tax liabilities, and even family conflict. At The Dayton Law Firm, P.C., we routinely counsel clients in California on how to gift assets properly as part of a thoughtful estate plan. Below, we explore the most common mistakes people make when gifting assets—and how you can avoid them.
The Allure and Risks of Gifting in Estate Planning
Many clients come to us with the understandable desire to pass along wealth while they are still alive to see it make an impact. Whether helping a child buy a home, funding a grandchild’s education, or donating to charity, lifetime gifting allows you to control the outcome of your generosity. However, these gifts are often made without fully considering the tax consequences, legal documentation, or strategic alignment with the broader estate plan. Even well-intentioned gifts can have unintended consequences. Let’s walk through the most common pitfalls.
1. Failing to Understand the Federal Gift Tax Rules
The federal government imposes a gift tax on transfers of money or property that exceed certain limits. Currently, individuals can give up to $19,000 per recipient per year (as of 2025) without triggering the need to file a gift tax return. This is known as the “annual exclusion.” Married couples can effectively double this amount and give up to $38,000 jointly.
Any gift above that amount must be reported to the IRS using Form 709, even if it doesn’t result in an immediate tax bill. Many people incorrectly assume that if no money changes hands—or if a gift is given to family—it doesn’t count. But the IRS doesn’t distinguish based on the relationship of the parties; it evaluates the fair market value of what’s given away. If you give property, a business interest, or a valuable collectible, the rules apply.
2. Exceeding the Lifetime Exemption Without Realizing It
Gifts beyond the annual exclusion reduce your lifetime gift and estate tax exemption, which is currently over $13 million per individual (through the end of 2025). Once you use up that exemption during your lifetime, future gifts—or your estate at death—may become taxable.
Many people don’t track their cumulative gifting or understand how it chips away at the exemption. As a result, they may inadvertently create a future estate tax liability for their heirs. With the federal exemption set to revert to pre-2018 levels (approximately half its current amount) in 2026, proactive planning is essential.
3. Improper Valuation of Gifts
The IRS requires that gifts be valued accurately and at fair market value. This becomes critical when gifting complex or non-liquid assets like real estate, privately held business interests, or art. Undervaluing an asset to avoid reporting it can result in serious penalties. Overvaluing can unnecessarily reduce your lifetime exemption or inflate your tax liability.
Obtaining a professional appraisal or valuation is not just best practice—it can protect you if the IRS ever audits your return. Too often, clients guess at values or use informal estimates, only to face issues later.
4. Giving Away Assets That Could Trigger Capital Gains for the Recipient
One of the lesser-known tax traps in gifting is the issue of cost basis. When you gift an asset during your lifetime, the recipient takes on your original cost basis. If they later sell the asset, they may owe significant capital gains tax based on the difference between your purchase price and the sales price.
For example, if you bought stock for $20,000 and it’s now worth $100,000, gifting it means the recipient will owe taxes on $80,000 in gain when they sell. By contrast, if the same asset were inherited upon your death, the cost basis would “step up” to the fair market value at death, eliminating the capital gain.
This makes it essential to weigh the benefits of gifting now versus leaving the asset in your estate.
5. Not Coordinating Gifting With the Overall Estate Plan
One of the most common—and easily avoidable—mistakes in estate planning is treating lifetime gifts as standalone decisions rather than integrating them into the broader estate plan. Gifting in isolation, without revisiting your will, trust, or beneficiary designations, can create inconsistencies that lead to confusion, inequity among heirs, or even litigation after your death.
For instance, a parent who gives a $250,000 down payment to one child to help purchase a home may assume that gesture is understood as a gift. But if the estate plan later divides the estate equally among three children, the others may feel shortchanged—or may legally challenge the distribution—if that substantial gift wasn’t disclosed or accounted for. Without clarification in your estate documents or a written memo of intent, beneficiaries may interpret the gift as an advancement on inheritance or even an unpaid loan.
Improperly documented gifts can also spark probate challenges. In some cases, heirs may argue that gifts made shortly before death were the result of undue influence or mental incapacity, especially if they weren’t disclosed during the planning process. A sudden or large gift that contradicts a longstanding estate plan can appear suspicious and lead to court intervention or family conflict.
To avoid these outcomes, gifting should always be coordinated with your estate planning instruments. If you have a revocable living trust, it should reflect—or at least account for—major gifts made during your lifetime. Powers of attorney should authorize the agent to make gifts if you become incapacitated, and any intentions regarding equalization between beneficiaries should be clearly spelled out in writing. Regular reviews of your estate plan help ensure that your actions today remain consistent with your long-term goals and family dynamics.
6. Overlooking State-Specific Rules and Tax Implications
Many California residents assume that because the state does not impose a gift tax, they can freely gift property without worrying about state-level consequences. While it’s true that California does not currently levy a state gift or inheritance tax, this assumption can be dangerous for individuals who own assets in other states—or plan to relocate in the future.
States like Connecticut and Minnesota still impose their own gift taxes, and others have estate or inheritance taxes with lower exemption thresholds than the federal government. If you own real estate or business interests in those states, a gift of that property could trigger a filing requirement or unexpected liability under local law.
Residency also plays a key role. If you are a California resident but gift property located in a state with stricter transfer rules, that state’s laws may apply. Some jurisdictions treat out-of-state transfers differently, and even your legal status as a resident or non-resident can affect whether the gift is recognized and how it is taxed.
There are also differences in how states treat jointly owned property, community property, and lifetime transfers through revocable trusts or LLCs. A gift that is valid and non-taxable in California might be considered incomplete, improperly recorded, or even invalid under another state’s statutes—especially in the absence of proper legal documentation.
Given the patchwork of laws across the U.S., it’s essential to consider where your assets are located and how local regulations may impact a gift. This is especially true for individuals who own out-of-state vacation homes or commercial real estate, or have recently moved or retired to California from another state. Consulting with an attorney who understands both California law and multi-jurisdictional issues ensures your gifting strategy is both legal and effective wherever your assets reside.
7. Gifting Without Considering Medicaid and Long-Term Care Planning
A major pitfall for older adults is making gifts without understanding how they may impact eligibility for government benefits like Medi-Cal (California’s Medicaid program). Medi-Cal imposes a five-year “lookback” period for asset transfers. Gifts made within that time may result in a penalty period during which you are ineligible for benefits, even if you have no remaining assets.
For those seeking to protect assets while qualifying for long-term care benefits, a properly structured trust may be a better solution than outright gifting. An elder law attorney can help integrate gifting with long-term care planning.
8. Gifting Highly Illiquid or Encumbered Assets
It’s also important to consider whether the gift is truly helpful to the recipient. Gifting a timeshare, a commercial building with liens, or a large but illiquid business interest may create more burdens than benefits. The recipient may face property taxes, insurance requirements, or operational costs they can’t afford.
Such assets should be gifted with care, often using legal structures like LLCs or limited partnerships to simplify administration and protect both parties.
9. Gifting Without Legal or Financial Guidance
One of the most common and costly mistakes is failing to consult professionals before making a substantial gift. While giving a few thousand dollars to a family member may not require legal input, giving away a home, business, or significant financial account absolutely does.
DIY gifting, based on incomplete internet research or verbal promises, can unravel quickly. Whether it’s drafting proper transfer documents, filing tax returns, or structuring a gift through a trust, an estate planning attorney ensures your actions are legally sound and tax-efficient.
The Right Way to Gift: Smart Strategies for Wealth Transfer
When it comes to gifting assets as part of an estate plan, intention alone isn’t enough. Strategic execution is what ensures your generosity benefits others without creating unnecessary tax exposure or legal confusion. The good news is that some well-established tools and methods allow you to transfer wealth efficiently, minimize risk, and preserve long-term estate goals. By using the right strategies—and avoiding the mistakes discussed earlier—you can turn gifting into a powerful legacy-building tool.
Make the Most of Annual Exclusions
One of the most straightforward strategies is to take full advantage of the annual exclusion gift. For 2025, the IRS allows individuals to give up to $19,000 per recipient per year without triggering the need to file a gift tax return. Married couples can double that amount to $38,000. These gifts don’t count against your lifetime exemption and can gradually reduce the size of your taxable estate over time. When used consistently—especially across multiple beneficiaries—this method is a simple yet effective way to transfer wealth while staying under the IRS radar.
Consider Irrevocable Trusts
For larger gifts, more sophisticated vehicles like irrevocable gifting trusts are often the right tool. Common options include Irrevocable Life Insurance Trusts (ILITs), Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts (GRATs), and Charitable Remainder Unitrusts (CRUTs). These structures allow you to move high-value assets out of your estate while retaining some control or providing income streams. For example, an ILIT removes life insurance proceeds from your taxable estate, while a GRAT lets you pass appreciation on assets to beneficiaries with little or no gift tax cost. These trusts also provide protection from creditors and can establish long-term financial security for heirs.
Gift Appreciating Assets Early
Another tax-smart move is gifting appreciating assets early. If you have investments, real estate, or business interests likely to increase in value, gifting them now can freeze their current value in your estate. This means all future growth occurs in the hands of the recipient—not under the umbrella of your estate tax exposure. That said, it’s crucial to weigh this approach against the capital gains consequences since lifetime gifts retain your cost basis.
Use College Savings Plans
You can also make use of 529 college savings plans, which offer a tax-advantaged way to support education. Contributions to 529 plans qualify for the annual gift exclusion. They can even be front-loaded with five years’ worth of gifts in a single contribution. For those looking to leave a legacy of learning, this is a practical way to do so while reducing your estate.
Give to Charity
Lastly, don’t underestimate the value of charitable gifting. Donations to qualified charities can reduce both income and estate tax liability. Whether through outright gifts, donor-advised funds, or charitable trusts, this approach can align your legacy with your values while providing real financial benefits.
Across all these strategies, proper documentation is critical. Every gift—whether it’s a check, deed, or trust transfer—should be clearly recorded and legally executed. Ambiguous or undocumented gifts can lead to IRS scrutiny or family disputes. Working with an experienced estate planning attorney ensures your gifts are properly structured, disclosed, and integrated with your broader plan.
By using strategic gifting techniques, you can pass on your wealth thoughtfully and efficiently—supporting the people and causes you care about while protecting your estate from avoidable mistakes.
How The Dayton Law Firm, P.C. Can Help
At The Dayton Law Firm, P.C., we provide experienced, strategic guidance for individuals and families navigating complex estate planning decisions. Our team helps clients across California avoid costly mistakes, minimize tax exposure, and ensure that gifts align with both financial goals and legal protections. Whether you are making your first large gift or revising a sophisticated estate plan, we’re here to guide you through every step of the process.
Protecting Your Legacy Through Informed Gifting
Gifting can be one of the most rewarding aspects of estate planning—but only if it’s done correctly. From tax implications and valuation issues to long-term care planning and documentation, every gift should be part of a larger strategy. Don’t leave your legacy to chance. Contact The Dayton Law Firm, P.C. today to review your estate plan and gifting strategy with a knowledgeable legal team who can protect your interests and those of your loved ones.